Skip to main content

Microsoft is Stupid, Apple is Not (I didn't make the title up)

Recently I read a story about how Mac users are stupid and that eventually viruses will kill us all and pillage our warez on the OS X platform.  

While there has been an increase of attacks on the mac platform, most still, are client side.  Attacks against Quicktime, attacks against Safari, Safari on the iPhone, etc..  But they are still client side.  Do I think this is any less of a threat?  No, because you will, no matter what, have dumb users that refuse to patch their machines, not-heed "workarounds" (like turning off rtsp for example), and what not. 

I read this article today entitled "Microsoft is Stupid, Apple is Not" about how Apple conscientiously made the decision awhile back to get rid of the Mac OS and switch to the Unix based (freebsd based for you purists, with a Mach kernel) OS X (or 10 if you like that) that we have now.  While in the meantime Windows has had to deal with legacy software and compatibility with old stuff.  I think it was a great decision, and that's what made me come back to the Mac platform (I used it when I was in high school, OS 7-8 timeframe.  My school was very Mac centric, except for Keyboarding class, and we all know, if you've read my blog for awhile, how keyboarding class turned out.)  I think both articles are worth a read.   I also think that Linux is in the same boat as OS X is in this case.  Security through obscurity?  Maybe.  But I tend to think that the OS itself is more secure.

What do I think?  I think eventually there will be a bigger threat against the Mac Platform, I think it will continue to be mostly client side, I think that occasionally there will be "remote server side" attacks (such as the mDNSResponder exploit against Bonjour), I don't think we'll ever have the big "worm" problems that Windows has been plagued with in the past with Blaster and Code Red and such.  I think Trojans will play a role.  I think Malware and Spyware MIGHT play a roll, but I doubt it.  

I think OS X is inherently "out of the box" more secure than Windows.  (What open ports are on OSX by default?  5353?)  I think OS X's bsd underpinnings will help keep the stack and the permissions of separate users, and the privilege separation that you must have in order to install or modify any "system" settings will keep alot of stuff at bay.  However, you must take into account the "stupid user" factor.  And unfortunately..  that can be high.

 Subscribe in a reader


Popular posts from this blog

Offset, Depth, Distance, and Within

Without going off the deep-end here and discussing every single Snort rule keyword, I just wanted to touch on a few modifiers that people sometimes misunderstand.  They aren't difficult, and hopefully after this explanation and a few examples, I can clear some of the air around these five modifiers.

The five modifiers that I am talking about are
OffsetDepthDistanceWithinnocaseThese five modifiers are not keywords of themselves, but rather they apply as modifiers to another keyword.  That keyword is "content". The content keyword is one of the easiest pieces of the Snort rules language as all it does is look for a particular string.  So for instance if I wanted to look for the word "joel" within a packet.  A simple:
content:"joel";Would allow me to do that.  The interesting part comes into play when you want to specify where inside of a particular packet you want the string "joel" to be looked for.  If you are running just a plain content ma…

Writing Snort Rules Correctly

Let me start off by saying I'm not bashing the writer of this article, and I'm trying not to be super critical.  I don't want to discourage this person from writing articles about Snort rules.  It's great when people in the Snort community step up and explain some simple things out there.  There are mistakes, it comes with the territory.  If you choose to be one of the people that tries to write Snort rules, you also choose to be someone who wants to learn how to do it better.  That's why I write this blog post, not to bash the writer, but to teach.

I noticed this post today over at the "Tao of Signature Writing" blog, and to be honest I glanced over most of it figuring it was a rehash of things I've already read or things that have already been written from countless people about "Here's how you write Snort rules!".  I scrolled down quickly skimming, not reading at all really, and noticed this part:
Now, let us look at the second questio…

Safari 5.1.4 now available

Safari 5.1.4 now available, fixes issues and improves performance | TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog:

Improve JavaScript performanceImprove responsiveness when typing into the search field after changing network configurations or with an intermittent network connectionAddress an issue that could cause webpages to flash white when switching between Safari windowsAddress issues that prevented printing U.S. Postal Service shipping labels and embedded PDFsPreserve links in PDFs saved from webpagesFix an issue that could make Flash content appear incomplete after using gesture zoomingFix an issue that could cause the screen to dim while watching HTML5 videoImprove stability, compatibility and startup time when using extensionsAllow cookies set during regular browsing to be available after using Private BrowsingFix an issue that could cause some data to be left behind after pressing the "Remove All Website Data" button