In the Gmail interface, if you are in the middle of a "conversation" there is a black arrow to the message you are currently working with. That way you can put the arrow on a specific email and then hit enter to expand that message. The current Sparrow interface doesn't have the black arrow to see where you are in the conversation.
That being said, if you are in the middle of a thread (where there are new messages appended to an already thick stack of messages in a conversation that is collapsed when you reopen it), the black arrow should be by default placed on the new (non collapsed message), as Gmail does.
This is all for consistency in between the two platforms, and the need for the keyboard shortcuts (the best feature of Sparrow IMO) to function exactly the same as Gmail's.
Please leave comments below.
Showing posts with label Mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mail. Show all posts
Sunday, July 1
Tuesday, November 2
Archiving Emails in Mail.app, there's an app for that.
If you are using Mail.app on OSX, this post is for you.
It's been well known to people that read my blog that I am an Inbox-Zero ninja, and generally pride myself on my ability to get through vast amounts of email quickly because of the system that I have refined over the past several years of experimenting.
One of the things about Inbox Zero is the ability to quickly move an email out of your "Inbox" and into another folder. If you sort your emails that come into your Inbox by topic or subject or whatever, different folders may do good things for you. For instance I have a folder where all Snort related email goes. The three Snort mailing lists go straight to my inbox where I read most of them and then file them away using a keyboard shortcut. Other Snort related mailing lists just go straight to this box, leaving me with only the important ones in my inbox.
Most listserver traffic of the 40 or so listservers that I belong to go straight to a "listserver" folder, where I can deal with it later. You get my point.
But everything that I don't filter, is in my inbox, which usually nets me about 200~ emails a day that I need to deal with. When I read an email I have possible outcomes.
Duh. I don't do enough of this.
This is the meat of the post, and kind of the point of writing this article. I am a firm believer in leaving your hands on the keyboard if possible. Learning the keyboard shortcuts in your favorite app will not only save time, but it also keeps your hands where you need to be doing work. On the keyboard (instead of continually reaching for your mouse). There are keyboard shortcuts for almost anything in OSX, and if you can't find it, or the menu command doesn't have a keyboard shortcut, you can make a keyboard shortcut to do what you want in Snow Leopard. Heck, there are keyboard shortcuts in Gmail (learn em!)
Now, how do you do this in Mail.app, well there is a little app called "Archive" that will allow you to do this.
Archive. Archive allows you to do exactly that. Archive the email that you are presently on. It creates a folder in your email accounts named "Archive", and when you mash the shortcut in your inbox, it puts the email that you have lighted in the appropriate Archive folder. Simple, clean, done.
There is also Mail Act-On, which I've talked about before here, is a nice little app if you need to do more advanced things than Archive, but for 99% of you, check out Archive, it does what you need.
If I think it'll take less than 2 minutes to respond to the email that I am currently reading, I'll bang out a response. I try to not bang out a "quick" response "just to keep the ball moving" as Kevin Rose says. I try to write out a through response. My point in doing this is to eliminate further email by providing any answers I can, by asking the appropriate question so that the response to my email is full of exactly what I need it to be, and so that people don't waste more time by me not wasting theirs with a "short terse banged-out email".
Otherwise known as the "Forward" button. I get a ton of email, not all appropriate for me to handle, some need to go to our web team, some need to go to our research team, but it comes to me, because I "handle" the email, as opposed to ignore it. I don't mind being the conduit to which people communicate, at least I know things are getting done, and I have a pulse on what is going on.
If the email contains an action that I need to perform, but I can't do it right now, I have a keyboard shortcut that allows me to highlight a section of text, mash a keyboard shortcut, and Omnifocus will grab the hightlight-ed input that I selected and makes a Todo out of it, along with a link in Omnifocus back to the email that generated it. (This is called "Clipping" for you Omnifocus nerds, get ON IT.) I quickly set a context (email) and a due date. Then I go onto the next email. Everyday, I get to the bottom of the "Todo"s that are due that day, and that includes the thoughtful emails.
Matter of fact, writing this post about "Archive" was a Todo.
Let me go mark it done.
BTW -- Inbox Zero comes from Merlin Mann. I'm not stealing his work. It's insightful. He rocks. MerlinMann.com and InboxZero.com
It's been well known to people that read my blog that I am an Inbox-Zero ninja, and generally pride myself on my ability to get through vast amounts of email quickly because of the system that I have refined over the past several years of experimenting.
Techniques in Archiving
One of the things about Inbox Zero is the ability to quickly move an email out of your "Inbox" and into another folder. If you sort your emails that come into your Inbox by topic or subject or whatever, different folders may do good things for you. For instance I have a folder where all Snort related email goes. The three Snort mailing lists go straight to my inbox where I read most of them and then file them away using a keyboard shortcut. Other Snort related mailing lists just go straight to this box, leaving me with only the important ones in my inbox.
Most listserver traffic of the 40 or so listservers that I belong to go straight to a "listserver" folder, where I can deal with it later. You get my point.
But everything that I don't filter, is in my inbox, which usually nets me about 200~ emails a day that I need to deal with. When I read an email I have possible outcomes.
- Delete it
- Archive it (if I need it later)
- Respond to it (if it takes shorter than 2 minutes to accomplish this task)
- Delegate it (if I am not the appropriate person to deal with "x" email)
- Make a todo to deal with it later.
Delete it
Duh. I don't do enough of this.
Archive it.
This is the meat of the post, and kind of the point of writing this article. I am a firm believer in leaving your hands on the keyboard if possible. Learning the keyboard shortcuts in your favorite app will not only save time, but it also keeps your hands where you need to be doing work. On the keyboard (instead of continually reaching for your mouse). There are keyboard shortcuts for almost anything in OSX, and if you can't find it, or the menu command doesn't have a keyboard shortcut, you can make a keyboard shortcut to do what you want in Snow Leopard. Heck, there are keyboard shortcuts in Gmail (learn em!)
Now, how do you do this in Mail.app, well there is a little app called "Archive" that will allow you to do this.
Archive. Archive allows you to do exactly that. Archive the email that you are presently on. It creates a folder in your email accounts named "Archive", and when you mash the shortcut in your inbox, it puts the email that you have lighted in the appropriate Archive folder. Simple, clean, done.
There is also Mail Act-On, which I've talked about before here, is a nice little app if you need to do more advanced things than Archive, but for 99% of you, check out Archive, it does what you need.
Respond to it
If I think it'll take less than 2 minutes to respond to the email that I am currently reading, I'll bang out a response. I try to not bang out a "quick" response "just to keep the ball moving" as Kevin Rose says. I try to write out a through response. My point in doing this is to eliminate further email by providing any answers I can, by asking the appropriate question so that the response to my email is full of exactly what I need it to be, and so that people don't waste more time by me not wasting theirs with a "short terse banged-out email".
Delegate It.
Otherwise known as the "Forward" button. I get a ton of email, not all appropriate for me to handle, some need to go to our web team, some need to go to our research team, but it comes to me, because I "handle" the email, as opposed to ignore it. I don't mind being the conduit to which people communicate, at least I know things are getting done, and I have a pulse on what is going on.
Todo It.
If the email contains an action that I need to perform, but I can't do it right now, I have a keyboard shortcut that allows me to highlight a section of text, mash a keyboard shortcut, and Omnifocus will grab the hightlight-ed input that I selected and makes a Todo out of it, along with a link in Omnifocus back to the email that generated it. (This is called "Clipping" for you Omnifocus nerds, get ON IT.) I quickly set a context (email) and a due date. Then I go onto the next email. Everyday, I get to the bottom of the "Todo"s that are due that day, and that includes the thoughtful emails.
Matter of fact, writing this post about "Archive" was a Todo.
Let me go mark it done.
BTW -- Inbox Zero comes from Merlin Mann. I'm not stealing his work. It's insightful. He rocks. MerlinMann.com and InboxZero.com
Tuesday, October 26
Notes syncing between Mail.app and iPhone, finally
I've written several times over the years about the need for Notes to sync automatically between the iPhone and the Mac Mail.app Desktop application. Well, unbeknownst to me (because I stopped using Notes in Mail.app because of the lack of this feature), in iOS 4.0 Apple has built this in.
I didn't test it right away when the release came out, and just now that I haven't written about it either since they built this in. But it works.
If you have an IMAP account, you can go into your account settings on your iPhone and turn on "Notes" in that account's preferences. Mail will create a folder called "Notes" on the IMAP server, and your "Notes" on Mail.app will be sync'ed Over-the-Air with your iPhone.
I have my Mail.app set up like this:

So that all my notes and to-do's stay intact in one account, and not spread apart different accounts. But there is more than one advantage to MobileMe for this particular feature. If you set it to MobileMe, Notes are pushed. (As opposed to pull, as they would be with other IMAP accounts.)
In short, Apple enabled Notes syncing in iOS 4.0. It works. Give it a shot.
I didn't test it right away when the release came out, and just now that I haven't written about it either since they built this in. But it works.
If you have an IMAP account, you can go into your account settings on your iPhone and turn on "Notes" in that account's preferences. Mail will create a folder called "Notes" on the IMAP server, and your "Notes" on Mail.app will be sync'ed Over-the-Air with your iPhone.
I have my Mail.app set up like this:
So that all my notes and to-do's stay intact in one account, and not spread apart different accounts. But there is more than one advantage to MobileMe for this particular feature. If you set it to MobileMe, Notes are pushed. (As opposed to pull, as they would be with other IMAP accounts.)
In short, Apple enabled Notes syncing in iOS 4.0. It works. Give it a shot.
Thursday, July 22
Reading Spam with Common Sense
Usually when I receive an email that looks like spam, I can just mash my "Send to Junk" keyboard shortcut and it goes away. But every once in awhile there is a decent looking spam that *might* be real. At first glance it won't have an images or selling viagra, or anything like that in it, and might just look real.
This is where the common sense approach to reading email kicks in. Obviously this post it not for the expert, this is probably more of the occasional user, but maybe someone in between will find it useful.
Here's a spam I received this morning that prompted me to write this diary:
From: Comcast
"This is a courtesy reminder that your Comcast Billing Information needs to be verified.
In order to continue using comcast services, click the link below, sign in and and follow the provided steps:
<Malicious Link was right here>
Regards,
Comcast Billing Department"
So, let's look at this and see how easy this is to detect:
Now, if we get into the weeds a bit more, we can look at the headers and see where it came from.
It came from a server at a .edu. I don't want to talk about which .edu (but it was in the United States), as I am going to try and get in touch with their security department after I get done writing this Diary.
Even more bad though -- it came from the "root" account on this server, the headers even indicate what version of Linux this server was running (Ubuntu). Most likely culprit? Probably an SSH scan that compromised the root account.
Make sure you have tight controls over those SSH accounts! And use common sense when reading your email. If it looks like bull, and it smells like bull. Chances are, it's bull.
Hopefully this helped someone.
Oh, the malicious link? Pointed you to a site that collected your usernames and passwords.
This is where the common sense approach to reading email kicks in. Obviously this post it not for the expert, this is probably more of the occasional user, but maybe someone in between will find it useful.
Here's a spam I received this morning that prompted me to write this diary:
From: Comcast
"This is a courtesy reminder that your Comcast Billing Information needs to be verified.
In order to continue using comcast services, click the link below, sign in and and follow the provided steps:
<Malicious Link was right here>
Regards,
Comcast Billing Department"
So, let's look at this and see how easy this is to detect:
- I'm not a Comcast customer. So right there, it was easy to detect.
- "comcast" in the second line is not capitalized. A real Comcast email would have capitalized their own companies name.
- Usually an email like this (from Comcast corporate) would tend to have all kinds of disclaimers and other nonsense at the bottom of the email.
- The link that I removed was not to "comcast.com"
Now, if we get into the weeds a bit more, we can look at the headers and see where it came from.
It came from a server at a .edu. I don't want to talk about which .edu (but it was in the United States), as I am going to try and get in touch with their security department after I get done writing this Diary.
Even more bad though -- it came from the "root" account on this server, the headers even indicate what version of Linux this server was running (Ubuntu). Most likely culprit? Probably an SSH scan that compromised the root account.
Make sure you have tight controls over those SSH accounts! And use common sense when reading your email. If it looks like bull, and it smells like bull. Chances are, it's bull.
Hopefully this helped someone.
Oh, the malicious link? Pointed you to a site that collected your usernames and passwords.
Tuesday, July 13
Plug-Ins I use for Mail.app
Attention Mac Users that use Mail.app, this one is for you.
Mail.app has a bunch of plugins that are available to it, not like Thunderbird, where Mozilla holds a repository of Plugins, Apple doesn't do that. But there are a ton of them available on the Internet and it would be great if Apple would do something like that (like they are about to do with html5 extensions for Safari). Mail calls these plugins "Bundles" and are found in the ~/Library/Mail/Bundles directory. I just wanted to write a post about a few of the Bundles that I use with Mail.app to make my email a lot easier to use.
Mail Act-On, written by indev software, the same people who provide MiniMail and Mail Tags (two other great bundles that I don't use), is an Email organization tool. Basically it allows you to tie Mail.app rules to keystrokes. So for example, one of the Keystrokes that I use is "`1" (Backtick, 1). The rule I have tied to that command is to move whatever the current email I have highlighted to a certain folder. What I do is have most of the email that I deal with from listservers go directly to folders (on the server), and then the Mails from certain webservers and other "To Me" email goes to my Inbox. Since I use the Inbox Zero method of filtering email, I can read an email, and if I want to file it away, I use the keystroke to move it to my Archive folder. Simple, done. I can color emails certain colors, I can move emails around, etc. It's nice, and I suggest it's use.
Widemail is a bundle that displays your email in the three column format. Similar to how the newer versions of Outlook and Entourage display your email, I find this method of email is easier to read (from left to right) as opposed to the old Outlook method of from the "Top Down". It also allows you to color code rows two different colors so it's easy to spot where your cursor is at.
Quotefixformac is like Outlook Quotefix. It reformats emails for bottom posting, cleans up the cruft, removes the signature from the original message, cleans up unnecessary lines, and even prune replies above a certain indentation. It's a nice tool and I use it to format emails the way I like them as well.
So, just three plugins I use for Mail.app, check them out, give them a shot, support the developers that made them.
Mail.app has a bunch of plugins that are available to it, not like Thunderbird, where Mozilla holds a repository of Plugins, Apple doesn't do that. But there are a ton of them available on the Internet and it would be great if Apple would do something like that (like they are about to do with html5 extensions for Safari). Mail calls these plugins "Bundles" and are found in the ~/Library/Mail/Bundles directory. I just wanted to write a post about a few of the Bundles that I use with Mail.app to make my email a lot easier to use.
1. Mail Act-On
Mail Act-On, written by indev software, the same people who provide MiniMail and Mail Tags (two other great bundles that I don't use), is an Email organization tool. Basically it allows you to tie Mail.app rules to keystrokes. So for example, one of the Keystrokes that I use is "`1" (Backtick, 1). The rule I have tied to that command is to move whatever the current email I have highlighted to a certain folder. What I do is have most of the email that I deal with from listservers go directly to folders (on the server), and then the Mails from certain webservers and other "To Me" email goes to my Inbox. Since I use the Inbox Zero method of filtering email, I can read an email, and if I want to file it away, I use the keystroke to move it to my Archive folder. Simple, done. I can color emails certain colors, I can move emails around, etc. It's nice, and I suggest it's use.
2. Widemail
Widemail is a bundle that displays your email in the three column format. Similar to how the newer versions of Outlook and Entourage display your email, I find this method of email is easier to read (from left to right) as opposed to the old Outlook method of from the "Top Down". It also allows you to color code rows two different colors so it's easy to spot where your cursor is at.
3. QuoteFix
Quotefixformac is like Outlook Quotefix. It reformats emails for bottom posting, cleans up the cruft, removes the signature from the original message, cleans up unnecessary lines, and even prune replies above a certain indentation. It's a nice tool and I use it to format emails the way I like them as well.
So, just three plugins I use for Mail.app, check them out, give them a shot, support the developers that made them.
Thursday, June 17
Black Background in Mail.app
I've noticed that for some reason, after you install Safari 5 on OSX, if you are to do a command where it creates an email out of a file. For instance:
Open a PDF in Preview and you want to email that to someone else, you go to File, and click "Email this PDF" (or similar) It'll create a new email message, but the background of the mail message will be black.
I've noticed this in Omnifocus as well, if I use a shortcut key to create a "To-Do" from another application by using the "Clipping" function, the background of the "To-Do" will be black.
Well, at least in Mail there is a fix.
If you want to keep the email HTML, Command -A will select the contents of the email, Cut it (not copy it), (command x), then repaste it with Option-Shift-Command-V (Paste and Match Style -- this is in the Edit menu). Or... You can change the email to Plain Text (which will get rid of the black box), Plain Text is in the Format menu. Or Command Shift T.
Plain Text is usually better anyway.
Open a PDF in Preview and you want to email that to someone else, you go to File, and click "Email this PDF" (or similar) It'll create a new email message, but the background of the mail message will be black.
I've noticed this in Omnifocus as well, if I use a shortcut key to create a "To-Do" from another application by using the "Clipping" function, the background of the "To-Do" will be black.
Well, at least in Mail there is a fix.
If you want to keep the email HTML, Command -A will select the contents of the email, Cut it (not copy it), (command x), then repaste it with Option-Shift-Command-V (Paste and Match Style -- this is in the Edit menu). Or... You can change the email to Plain Text (which will get rid of the black box), Plain Text is in the Format menu. Or Command Shift T.
Plain Text is usually better anyway.
Monday, May 3
Verizon to block outbound port 25 for residential customers
For those of you that have Verizon Home Internet (FiOS or other), Verizon is about to start blocking outbound port 25.
Why?
Verizon | High Speed Internet - Your Attention Needed: Re-configure Your Email Settings to Send Email.
Why?
Why is Verizon blocking outbound port 25?
The majority of spam (unsolicited email) on the Internet is caused by malicious software viruses that take control of infected computers. These viruses direct the infected machines to send email through port 25. Verizon takes spam very seriously. Verizon blocks outgoing connections on port 25 to prevent infected computers from being used by spammers to send unsolicited email. Outbound port 25 blocking is a standard industry method to control spam.
For more information, click the link below:
Verizon | High Speed Internet - Your Attention Needed: Re-configure Your Email Settings to Send Email.
Thursday, April 22
How to make Mail.app go faster
For those of you that use Mail.app for a Mail client on your Mac.. This is one way to speed it up.
Go open your Applescript Editor and paste this in there:
This script came from here. However, if you copy and paste it from that website you have to correct all the quotes and single ticks in the whole script. Hopefully my above paste makes it better.
For background on what this does, this script cleans up the sqllite "Envelope Index" database that Mail.app uses to store it's list of emails and attachments. If you clean this up, Mail.app starts and runs a TON faster. Check out more here.
Go open your Applescript Editor and paste this in there:
tell application "Mail" to quitset sizeBefore to do shell script "ls -lah ~/Library/Mail | grep -E 'Envelope Index$' | awk {'print $5'}"
do shell script "/usr/bin/sqlite3 ~/Library/Mail/'Envelope Index' vacuum"
set sizeAfter to do shell script "ls -lah ~/Library/Mail | grep -E 'Envelope Index$' | awk {'print $5'}"
display dialog ("Mail index before: " & sizeBefore & return & "Mail index after: " & sizeAfter & return & return & "Enjoy the new speed!")
tell application "Mail" to activateThis script came from here. However, if you copy and paste it from that website you have to correct all the quotes and single ticks in the whole script. Hopefully my above paste makes it better.
For background on what this does, this script cleans up the sqllite "Envelope Index" database that Mail.app uses to store it's list of emails and attachments. If you clean this up, Mail.app starts and runs a TON faster. Check out more here.
Thursday, March 25
Detecting suspicious account activity on your Gmail
Official Gmail Blog: Detecting suspicious account activity.
I found this article interesting. Google has implemented a kind of security feature in Gmail. What it looks like, is now Google keeps track of the IPs that you log into your Gmail account from (which they have for awhile now, check this out from back in 2008) and let's you know of any very strange deviations in pattern.
The example they provide is this:
Google knows, in this example, that this person normally signs in from California in the USA, then suddenly in the middle of all the normal accesses, there is a login in Poland. Which is strange for the user, and you get this popup when you log into your gmail:
I think this is head and shoulders above what any of the other competitors are doing with their free online email solutions, and hopefully this will make strides to curbing some spam and illegal access of accounts.
No doubt that this had something to do with the illegal access of accounts from China during the whole "Google/Intel/insertothercompanieshere debacle". Glad to see Google doing things like this.
I found this article interesting. Google has implemented a kind of security feature in Gmail. What it looks like, is now Google keeps track of the IPs that you log into your Gmail account from (which they have for awhile now, check this out from back in 2008) and let's you know of any very strange deviations in pattern.
The example they provide is this:
Google knows, in this example, that this person normally signs in from California in the USA, then suddenly in the middle of all the normal accesses, there is a login in Poland. Which is strange for the user, and you get this popup when you log into your gmail:
I think this is head and shoulders above what any of the other competitors are doing with their free online email solutions, and hopefully this will make strides to curbing some spam and illegal access of accounts.
No doubt that this had something to do with the illegal access of accounts from China during the whole "Google/Intel/insertothercompanieshere debacle". Glad to see Google doing things like this.
Tuesday, March 23
iPhone universal inbox?
Julio Rodriguez, a fellow Apple user wrote Steve Jobs an email thanking Apple for their great customer service, and proclaiming his "life-long" customer status.
However, the interesting part for me came in the second paragraph where Julio ask Mr. Jobs:
Steve Jobs answered back in his typically terse answer form:
For a screenshot of the email (including headers), check it out here.
However, the interesting part for me came in the second paragraph where Julio ask Mr. Jobs:
I just have one question for you; will iPhone ever have a universal mailbox just like Mail has on my Mac? It would be so much easier and efficient
Steve Jobs answered back in his typically terse answer form:
Yep.
Sent from my iPad
For a screenshot of the email (including headers), check it out here.
Monday, March 1
Plugins add grunt to Google’s Quick Search Box
Plugins add grunt to Google’s Quick Search Box « Hawk Wings.
If you are a user of Google's Quick Search Box (similar to QuickSilver), and is in active development, you can download and use these series of scripts in order to interact with the rest of your OS. (Things like sending a file through email in Mail.app).
Or, you can just stick with QuickSilver. It does all these things already.
If you are a user of Google's Quick Search Box (similar to QuickSilver), and is in active development, you can download and use these series of scripts in order to interact with the rest of your OS. (Things like sending a file through email in Mail.app).
Or, you can just stick with QuickSilver. It does all these things already.
Wednesday, February 3
Great Anti-Email post
Jeff Atwood, blogger and coder over at Coding Horror, one of the many blogs I read, had this post up sometime last year, and I thought it was such a good post that I've recommended it to a couple friends, but I realized I never actually blogged it.
Jeff discusses a similar topic to what I've discussed in the past. Checking email less often, shutting your email off for periods of time, turn off the "new message" ding. All great points.
Go check out his post here. Jeff, great job!
Jeff discusses a similar topic to what I've discussed in the past. Checking email less often, shutting your email off for periods of time, turn off the "new message" ding. All great points.
Go check out his post here. Jeff, great job!
Thursday, January 28
iPad, why it's interesting
Yesterday, as everyone -- including me -- expected, Apple introduced their first big foray into the tablet computing market (if you don't count the iPhone as a tablet) called the iPad.
Which, even I, as an Apple fan, has to admit-- is a stupid name. iSlate, or even "Tablet" would have been better, but, whatever. (Plus, Fujitsu owns the "iPad" trademark, so we'll see what it winds up being -- remember "iTV" changed to "Apple TV" at launch.
Am I interested in one? Yes. I am interested because it's just enough for me to NOT have to carry around my laptop bag anymore. Potentially eliminating the need to carry anything outside of a jacket. (Using a jacket like the Scottevest line: http://www.scottevest.com/ -- which is just handy, all those pockets.) 90% of my work could be done a device like this, and I'm just happy about that.
I don't think people are overwhelmed by it right now in this iteration because people feel it's just a big iPod Touch. Well, fine. I have to kind of agree with that idea, but look at how far the iPod Touch has come along since it's release. It's not about the platform people, it's the APPS. We'll see what happens in 60 days before it's release. We'll see what happens in a year.
There is going to be a completely different class of Apps developed for this thing. I fully expect even people like Microsoft to develop a version of Office (or maybe use the online office) for this thing.
Think of the possibilities for a couple markets:
A) Schools. Imagine school children, colleges, high schools, etc with this thing as a standard issue device. Think of what is going to come about as far as accessibilities to text books, not having to carry them around anymore. Think about taking your quizzes and tests online, doing your homework online. The elimination of the wasteful use of paper is coming in a big way.
B) Medical application. Think of a doctor being able to walk around a hospital, every patients records, xrays, results, insurance cards, everything. Accessible with their fingers. Think about the Doctors being able to make notes right into the patients online chart.
These are just a couple examples I can think of off the top of my head about the possibilities for a device like this.
Security
Now, how should we treat this device from a security perspective? It's a mobile device, but it's not a phone, it can't make phone calls. (Native phone calls, not through Skype.) It's not a laptop, it's more mobile than that.
I would have to say that'd we'd need to treat this device as a phone. For the most part, it's a platform that has near ubiquitous access to the internet. Any Starbucks, Barnes and Nobles, etc. Then with the cheap 3G access available on it, I think there is going to be a whole class of people (maybe the sub-20 year old demographic) that would use this as a computer. They don't need anything else for the most part. My wife doesn't need anything more than this device. Will you be able to print from it? Probably not, but that's really the only thing I see that needs to be added from a software point of view for this to replace most computers. My parents would use this instead of regular computer, most people would, if all they did was process email and read web pages on it.
This is the perfect couch device, this is the perfect "train" or "plane" device. There are a ton of possibilities for this thing, not necessarily at launch, but in a year/two years from now, this may be the computing platform that we are all using.
I'm really only disappointed in one thing. No face forward video camera for teleconferencing? Hm. Well, let's think of this thing sitting on your lap. Ideally the camera would need to be up higher, level with your face, otherwise people on a video conference with you would be looking up your nose the whole time. Yes of course you could prop it up, but that's not going to happen all the time. That's really my only disappointment.
We'll see..
Which, even I, as an Apple fan, has to admit-- is a stupid name. iSlate, or even "Tablet" would have been better, but, whatever. (Plus, Fujitsu owns the "iPad" trademark, so we'll see what it winds up being -- remember "iTV" changed to "Apple TV" at launch.
Am I interested in one? Yes. I am interested because it's just enough for me to NOT have to carry around my laptop bag anymore. Potentially eliminating the need to carry anything outside of a jacket. (Using a jacket like the Scottevest line: http://www.scottevest.com/ -- which is just handy, all those pockets.) 90% of my work could be done a device like this, and I'm just happy about that.
I don't think people are overwhelmed by it right now in this iteration because people feel it's just a big iPod Touch. Well, fine. I have to kind of agree with that idea, but look at how far the iPod Touch has come along since it's release. It's not about the platform people, it's the APPS. We'll see what happens in 60 days before it's release. We'll see what happens in a year.
There is going to be a completely different class of Apps developed for this thing. I fully expect even people like Microsoft to develop a version of Office (or maybe use the online office) for this thing.
Think of the possibilities for a couple markets:
A) Schools. Imagine school children, colleges, high schools, etc with this thing as a standard issue device. Think of what is going to come about as far as accessibilities to text books, not having to carry them around anymore. Think about taking your quizzes and tests online, doing your homework online. The elimination of the wasteful use of paper is coming in a big way.
B) Medical application. Think of a doctor being able to walk around a hospital, every patients records, xrays, results, insurance cards, everything. Accessible with their fingers. Think about the Doctors being able to make notes right into the patients online chart.
These are just a couple examples I can think of off the top of my head about the possibilities for a device like this.
Security
Now, how should we treat this device from a security perspective? It's a mobile device, but it's not a phone, it can't make phone calls. (Native phone calls, not through Skype.) It's not a laptop, it's more mobile than that.
I would have to say that'd we'd need to treat this device as a phone. For the most part, it's a platform that has near ubiquitous access to the internet. Any Starbucks, Barnes and Nobles, etc. Then with the cheap 3G access available on it, I think there is going to be a whole class of people (maybe the sub-20 year old demographic) that would use this as a computer. They don't need anything else for the most part. My wife doesn't need anything more than this device. Will you be able to print from it? Probably not, but that's really the only thing I see that needs to be added from a software point of view for this to replace most computers. My parents would use this instead of regular computer, most people would, if all they did was process email and read web pages on it.
This is the perfect couch device, this is the perfect "train" or "plane" device. There are a ton of possibilities for this thing, not necessarily at launch, but in a year/two years from now, this may be the computing platform that we are all using.
I'm really only disappointed in one thing. No face forward video camera for teleconferencing? Hm. Well, let's think of this thing sitting on your lap. Ideally the camera would need to be up higher, level with your face, otherwise people on a video conference with you would be looking up your nose the whole time. Yes of course you could prop it up, but that's not going to happen all the time. That's really my only disappointment.
We'll see..
Thursday, December 24
Bottom Posting
Recently was chastised for Bottom posting on a Mailing list, so I thought I'd write a few words about it.
I bottom (or inline post) mostly because I like the email to be a message. You read a message or a letter from top to bottom, from left to right. It wasn't until email clients started top posting (looking at you Outlook/Lotus Notes) that email was written in the top-posting format, forcing you to read an email backwards.
So I looked it up, basically looking at two different information stores.
Wikipedia -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
RFC1855 -- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
These two places will define how to write email and how email should be written, on mailing lists, use groups, or any other email transaction.
The particular part to pay attention to is in RFC1855 --
"- If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
enough text of the original to give a context. This will make
sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
response to a message before seeing the original. Giving context
helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!"
Summarize the email at the top, and post below it. In other words, bottom-posting is the correct way to write email, as per RFC.
I bottom (or inline post) mostly because I like the email to be a message. You read a message or a letter from top to bottom, from left to right. It wasn't until email clients started top posting (looking at you Outlook/Lotus Notes) that email was written in the top-posting format, forcing you to read an email backwards.
So I looked it up, basically looking at two different information stores.
Wikipedia -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
RFC1855 -- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
These two places will define how to write email and how email should be written, on mailing lists, use groups, or any other email transaction.
The particular part to pay attention to is in RFC1855 --
"- If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
enough text of the original to give a context. This will make
sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
response to a message before seeing the original. Giving context
helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!"
Summarize the email at the top, and post below it. In other words, bottom-posting is the correct way to write email, as per RFC.
Monday, December 14
Things I wish about Email
Someone asked me:
"Joel,
I read your last post on Thunderbird and noticed you said [...] that you were "over client based email". I use Thunderbird. Why do you say that? What don't you like about [...], client based applications?" -- Yes I paraphrased. But spelling is intact.
Mail.app
-- I would like the ability to shut off Spotlight indexing. Meaning, I don't want Mail.app to download all of my Mail locally. It's IMAP, that means keep it up in the cloud. I don't want it here. Also? Very slow when dealing with Gmail.
-- I would like the "new" ability to "archive" an email with a keyboard shortcut. In Thunderbird 3.0, I can mash the "a" key and the Email that is currently selected is archived.
-- Threading. Threading is awful. It works GREAT in Gmail, and is perhaps Gmail's best feature, bar none.
-- No way to bottom post.
Thunderbird
-- Same as Mail.app as far as the Spotlight indexing goes, except, I can shut it off in Thunderbird (awesome!). But I don't want the client to download my email. Period. I want it kept in the cloud with no local copy.
-- Slow. SLOW.
-- Threading, same as Mail.app, Threading sucks. Again, Gmail has this down.
-- Too much CPU
-- Too much RAM. (600 Megs? Are you kidding me?)
Mutt
-- Slow
-- Can't open attachments, (yes, I know what you Mutt guys are going to say, but still, I would like the ability to just click (or tap a shortcut key) and open an attachment. Not having to do a bunch of crazy nonsense to tie apps together.
-- Threading, I rather like the threading that Mutt has, and the customizability of Mutt beats everything else, bar none.
Outlook
-- Seriously, Outlook sucks.
-- Why am I including it here?
-- No way to bottom post
-- Inconsistant GUI
-- Slow
-- No way to bottom post. Check out this fix (http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/)
-- No addons
-- No archiving
-- PST size limits
-- Bad rule granularity.
I solicited feedback from Twitter, regarding the above, and these are the responses I got.
"Lack of keyboard for control wrt to moving from folder to folder.. GMail makes that very easy." -- @jasonish
"The difficulty in working with the OS address book - Thunderbird vs Windows 7 contacts comes to mind (complicates my iphone sync)"
-- @tomsellers
"haven't found one with a conversation view on par with gmail."
-- @jjarmoc
"1) Folders < Labels (ability to 'symlink' emails to multiple tags) 2) i use 3-4 devices to check mail 3)Gmail's thread handling"
-- @jamesjtucker
and in the interest of fairness. I'll get on Gmail too.
Gmail
-- I want the ability to mark two conversations and make them thread together. For instance, let's say there is a thread, then someone answers that thread, but the mail client for that person adds "UNCLASSIFIED" to the thread. The Thread is then broken, visually, but it is still the same. I want to be able to combine them.
-- Your IMAP implementation really sucks. Bad. Oh, and it's slow as hell too, almost artificially. Seems like you really don't want people using any other email solution except for the web.
-- Drag and drop of attachments. This should be possible in HTML5, or at least with Google Gears
-- Lack of Google Gears (and thusly, no offline gmail support) for Safari/Snow Leopard. Can we get rid of Gears and be HTML5 compliant please?
-- Lack of Bottom Posting option. No, addons through Greasemonkey do not count. Want to really impress me? Reformat an entire email (when I hit reply), to flip the thread around based upon indexing, (come on, you guys can figure that out), to read top to bottom.
Check this out Google. Do THIS and all would be awesome -- http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
-- GPG/PGP support. I don't use it, simply because it's a pain. So I don't. I probably would if I could.
-- The ability to filter on more headers. Ideally, I'd love to be able to perform regex on headers. Similar to procmail.
-- Label based signature blocks. Or at least account based.
Please leave comments below.
"Joel,
I read your last post on Thunderbird and noticed you said [...] that you were "over client based email". I use Thunderbird. Why do you say that? What don't you like about [...], client based applications?" -- Yes I paraphrased. But spelling is intact.
Mail.app
-- I would like the ability to shut off Spotlight indexing. Meaning, I don't want Mail.app to download all of my Mail locally. It's IMAP, that means keep it up in the cloud. I don't want it here. Also? Very slow when dealing with Gmail.
-- I would like the "new" ability to "archive" an email with a keyboard shortcut. In Thunderbird 3.0, I can mash the "a" key and the Email that is currently selected is archived.
-- Threading. Threading is awful. It works GREAT in Gmail, and is perhaps Gmail's best feature, bar none.
-- No way to bottom post.
Thunderbird
-- Same as Mail.app as far as the Spotlight indexing goes, except, I can shut it off in Thunderbird (awesome!). But I don't want the client to download my email. Period. I want it kept in the cloud with no local copy.
-- Slow. SLOW.
-- Threading, same as Mail.app, Threading sucks. Again, Gmail has this down.
-- Too much CPU
-- Too much RAM. (600 Megs? Are you kidding me?)
Mutt
-- Slow
-- Can't open attachments, (yes, I know what you Mutt guys are going to say, but still, I would like the ability to just click (or tap a shortcut key) and open an attachment. Not having to do a bunch of crazy nonsense to tie apps together.
-- Threading, I rather like the threading that Mutt has, and the customizability of Mutt beats everything else, bar none.
Outlook
-- Seriously, Outlook sucks.
-- Why am I including it here?
-- No way to bottom post
-- Inconsistant GUI
-- Slow
-- No way to bottom post. Check out this fix (http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/)
-- No addons
-- No archiving
-- PST size limits
-- Bad rule granularity.
I solicited feedback from Twitter, regarding the above, and these are the responses I got.
"Lack of keyboard for control wrt to moving from folder to folder.. GMail makes that very easy." -- @jasonish
"The difficulty in working with the OS address book - Thunderbird vs Windows 7 contacts comes to mind (complicates my iphone sync)"
-- @tomsellers
"haven't found one with a conversation view on par with gmail."
-- @jjarmoc
"1) Folders < Labels (ability to 'symlink' emails to multiple tags) 2) i use 3-4 devices to check mail 3)Gmail's thread handling"
-- @jamesjtucker
and in the interest of fairness. I'll get on Gmail too.
Gmail
-- I want the ability to mark two conversations and make them thread together. For instance, let's say there is a thread, then someone answers that thread, but the mail client for that person adds "UNCLASSIFIED" to the thread. The Thread is then broken, visually, but it is still the same. I want to be able to combine them.
-- Your IMAP implementation really sucks. Bad. Oh, and it's slow as hell too, almost artificially. Seems like you really don't want people using any other email solution except for the web.
-- Drag and drop of attachments. This should be possible in HTML5, or at least with Google Gears
-- Lack of Google Gears (and thusly, no offline gmail support) for Safari/Snow Leopard. Can we get rid of Gears and be HTML5 compliant please?
-- Lack of Bottom Posting option. No, addons through Greasemonkey do not count. Want to really impress me? Reformat an entire email (when I hit reply), to flip the thread around based upon indexing, (come on, you guys can figure that out), to read top to bottom.
Check this out Google. Do THIS and all would be awesome -- http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
-- GPG/PGP support. I don't use it, simply because it's a pain. So I don't. I probably would if I could.
-- The ability to filter on more headers. Ideally, I'd love to be able to perform regex on headers. Similar to procmail.
-- Label based signature blocks. Or at least account based.
Please leave comments below.
Things I wish about Email
Someone asked me:
"Joel,
I read your last post on Thunderbird and noticed you said [...] that you were "over client based email". I use Thunderbird. Why do you say that? What don't you like about [...], client based applications?" -- Yes I paraphrased. But spelling is intact.
Mail.app
-- I would like the ability to shut off Spotlight indexing. Meaning, I don't want Mail.app to download all of my Mail locally. It's IMAP, that means keep it up in the cloud. I don't want it here. Also? Very slow when dealing with Gmail.
-- I would like the "new" ability to "archive" an email with a keyboard shortcut. In Thunderbird 3.0, I can mash the "a" key and the Email that is currently selected is archived.
-- Threading. Threading is awful. It works GREAT in Gmail, and is perhaps Gmail's best feature, bar none.
-- No way to bottom post.
Thunderbird
-- Same as Mail.app as far as the Spotlight indexing goes, except, I can shut it off in Thunderbird (awesome!). But I don't want the client to download my email. Period. I want it kept in the cloud with no local copy.
-- Slow. SLOW.
-- Threading, same as Mail.app, Threading sucks. Again, Gmail has this down.
-- Too much CPU
-- Too much RAM. (600 Megs? Are you kidding me?)
Mutt
-- Slow
-- Can't open attachments, (yes, I know what you Mutt guys are going to say, but still, I would like the ability to just click (or tap a shortcut key) and open an attachment. Not having to do a bunch of crazy nonsense to tie apps together.
-- Threading, I rather like the threading that Mutt has, and the customizability of Mutt beats everything else, bar none.
Outlook
-- Seriously, Outlook sucks.
-- Why am I including it here?
-- No way to bottom post
-- Inconsistant GUI
-- Slow
-- No way to bottom post. Check out this fix (http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/)
-- No addons
-- No archiving
-- PST size limits
-- Bad rule granularity.
I solicited feedback from Twitter, regarding the above, and these are the responses I got.
"Lack of keyboard for control wrt to moving from folder to folder.. GMail makes that very easy." -- @jasonish
"The difficulty in working with the OS address book - Thunderbird vs Windows 7 contacts comes to mind (complicates my iphone sync)"
-- @tomsellers
"haven't found one with a conversation view on par with gmail."
-- @jjarmoc
"1) Folders < Labels (ability to 'symlink' emails to multiple tags) 2) i use 3-4 devices to check mail 3)Gmail's thread handling"
-- @jamesjtucker
and in the interest of fairness. I'll get on Gmail too.
Gmail
-- I want the ability to mark two conversations and make them thread together. For instance, let's say there is a thread, then someone answers that thread, but the mail client for that person adds "UNCLASSIFIED" to the thread. The Thread is then broken, visually, but it is still the same. I want to be able to combine them.
-- Your IMAP implementation really sucks. Bad. Oh, and it's slow as hell too, almost artificially. Seems like you really don't want people using any other email solution except for the web.
-- Drag and drop of attachments. This should be possible in HTML5, or at least with Google Gears
-- Lack of Google Gears (and thusly, no offline gmail support) for Safari/Snow Leopard. Can we get rid of Gears and be HTML5 compliant please?
-- Lack of Bottom Posting option. No, addons through Greasemonkey do not count. Want to really impress me? Reformat an entire email (when I hit reply), to flip the thread around based upon indexing, (come on, you guys can figure that out), to read top to bottom.
Check this out Google. Do THIS and all would be awesome -- http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
-- GPG/PGP support. I don't use it, simply because it's a pain. So I don't. I probably would if I could.
-- The ability to filter on more headers. Ideally, I'd love to be able to perform regex on headers. Similar to procmail.
-- Label based signature blocks. Or at least account based.
"Joel,
I read your last post on Thunderbird and noticed you said [...] that you were "over client based email". I use Thunderbird. Why do you say that? What don't you like about [...], client based applications?" -- Yes I paraphrased. But spelling is intact.
Mail.app
-- I would like the ability to shut off Spotlight indexing. Meaning, I don't want Mail.app to download all of my Mail locally. It's IMAP, that means keep it up in the cloud. I don't want it here. Also? Very slow when dealing with Gmail.
-- I would like the "new" ability to "archive" an email with a keyboard shortcut. In Thunderbird 3.0, I can mash the "a" key and the Email that is currently selected is archived.
-- Threading. Threading is awful. It works GREAT in Gmail, and is perhaps Gmail's best feature, bar none.
-- No way to bottom post.
Thunderbird
-- Same as Mail.app as far as the Spotlight indexing goes, except, I can shut it off in Thunderbird (awesome!). But I don't want the client to download my email. Period. I want it kept in the cloud with no local copy.
-- Slow. SLOW.
-- Threading, same as Mail.app, Threading sucks. Again, Gmail has this down.
-- Too much CPU
-- Too much RAM. (600 Megs? Are you kidding me?)
Mutt
-- Slow
-- Can't open attachments, (yes, I know what you Mutt guys are going to say, but still, I would like the ability to just click (or tap a shortcut key) and open an attachment. Not having to do a bunch of crazy nonsense to tie apps together.
-- Threading, I rather like the threading that Mutt has, and the customizability of Mutt beats everything else, bar none.
Outlook
-- Seriously, Outlook sucks.
-- Why am I including it here?
-- No way to bottom post
-- Inconsistant GUI
-- Slow
-- No way to bottom post. Check out this fix (http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/)
-- No addons
-- No archiving
-- PST size limits
-- Bad rule granularity.
I solicited feedback from Twitter, regarding the above, and these are the responses I got.
"Lack of keyboard for control wrt to moving from folder to folder.. GMail makes that very easy." -- @jasonish
"The difficulty in working with the OS address book - Thunderbird vs Windows 7 contacts comes to mind (complicates my iphone sync)"
-- @tomsellers
"haven't found one with a conversation view on par with gmail."
-- @jjarmoc
"1) Folders < Labels (ability to 'symlink' emails to multiple tags) 2) i use 3-4 devices to check mail 3)Gmail's thread handling"
-- @jamesjtucker
and in the interest of fairness. I'll get on Gmail too.
Gmail
-- I want the ability to mark two conversations and make them thread together. For instance, let's say there is a thread, then someone answers that thread, but the mail client for that person adds "UNCLASSIFIED" to the thread. The Thread is then broken, visually, but it is still the same. I want to be able to combine them.
-- Your IMAP implementation really sucks. Bad. Oh, and it's slow as hell too, almost artificially. Seems like you really don't want people using any other email solution except for the web.
-- Drag and drop of attachments. This should be possible in HTML5, or at least with Google Gears
-- Lack of Google Gears (and thusly, no offline gmail support) for Safari/Snow Leopard. Can we get rid of Gears and be HTML5 compliant please?
-- Lack of Bottom Posting option. No, addons through Greasemonkey do not count. Want to really impress me? Reformat an entire email (when I hit reply), to flip the thread around based upon indexing, (come on, you guys can figure that out), to read top to bottom.
Check this out Google. Do THIS and all would be awesome -- http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
-- GPG/PGP support. I don't use it, simply because it's a pain. So I don't. I probably would if I could.
-- The ability to filter on more headers. Ideally, I'd love to be able to perform regex on headers. Similar to procmail.
-- Label based signature blocks. Or at least account based.
Sunday, December 13
Thunderbird 3.0
I know you've read from me time and again that I am a big proponent of Google's Gmail interface. However, ever since Mozilla put out Thunderbird 3.0, i've been trying it. It combines the best of both worlds, offline (even though Gmail just released that non-lab), client access, OSX integration. But perhaps the best thing is that they have an archiving system now.
You read a message and you mash "a" and the message is placed into an archive by year-month timestamp, and is no longer in your inbox. The simplest way, client side, to maintain Inbox-Zero.
Take a look at all the new features here.
Please leave comments below.
You read a message and you mash "a" and the message is placed into an archive by year-month timestamp, and is no longer in your inbox. The simplest way, client side, to maintain Inbox-Zero.
Take a look at all the new features here.
Please leave comments below.
Thunderbird 3.0
I know you've read from me time and again that I am a big proponent of Google's Gmail interface. However, ever since Mozilla put out Thunderbird 3.0, i've been trying it. It combines the best of both worlds, offline (even though Gmail just released that non-lab), client access, OSX integration. But perhaps the best thing is that they have an archiving system now.
You read a message and you mash "a" and the message is placed into an archive by year-month timestamp, and is no longer in your inbox. The simplest way, client side, to maintain Inbox-Zero.
Take a look at all the new features here.
Please leave comments below.
You read a message and you mash "a" and the message is placed into an archive by year-month timestamp, and is no longer in your inbox. The simplest way, client side, to maintain Inbox-Zero.
Take a look at all the new features here.
Please leave comments below.
Tuesday, October 13
Tungle Makes Cross-Calendar Scheduling Simple
This is a great idea.

If you're looking for a web-based application for scheduling meetings, you'll find no shortage. Want that application to sync to common calendar applications like Google Calendar, Outlook, and iCal? Prior to Tungle you were out of luck.
Tungle combines the best features of a variety of calendar syncing and meeting scheduling tools and rolls them all into one. With Tungle you can quickly jump from your existing calendar application to sending invites to your team members, checking their calendars even if you all use different applications, and optimizing everyone's schedule for the best meeting times. Check out the demonstration video below to see Tungle in action:
Tungle is a free service and is accessible by the Tungle site, an iPhone app, a Firefox plugin for Google Calendar, and a variety of apps for various social calendars.
via Lifehacker by Jason Fitzpatrick on 9/30/09
If you're looking for a web-based application for scheduling meetings, you'll find no shortage. Want that application to sync to common calendar applications like Google Calendar, Outlook, and iCal? Prior to Tungle you were out of luck.
Tungle combines the best features of a variety of calendar syncing and meeting scheduling tools and rolls them all into one. With Tungle you can quickly jump from your existing calendar application to sending invites to your team members, checking their calendars even if you all use different applications, and optimizing everyone's schedule for the best meeting times. Check out the demonstration video below to see Tungle in action:
Tungle is a free service and is accessible by the Tungle site, an iPhone app, a Firefox plugin for Google Calendar, and a variety of apps for various social calendars.
Tungle Makes Cross-Calendar Scheduling Simple
This is a great idea.

If you're looking for a web-based application for scheduling meetings, you'll find no shortage. Want that application to sync to common calendar applications like Google Calendar, Outlook, and iCal? Prior to Tungle you were out of luck.
Tungle combines the best features of a variety of calendar syncing and meeting scheduling tools and rolls them all into one. With Tungle you can quickly jump from your existing calendar application to sending invites to your team members, checking their calendars even if you all use different applications, and optimizing everyone's schedule for the best meeting times. Check out the demonstration video below to see Tungle in action:
Tungle is a free service and is accessible by the Tungle site, an iPhone app, a Firefox plugin for Google Calendar, and a variety of apps for various social calendars.
via Lifehacker by Jason Fitzpatrick on 9/30/09
If you're looking for a web-based application for scheduling meetings, you'll find no shortage. Want that application to sync to common calendar applications like Google Calendar, Outlook, and iCal? Prior to Tungle you were out of luck.
Tungle combines the best features of a variety of calendar syncing and meeting scheduling tools and rolls them all into one. With Tungle you can quickly jump from your existing calendar application to sending invites to your team members, checking their calendars even if you all use different applications, and optimizing everyone's schedule for the best meeting times. Check out the demonstration video below to see Tungle in action:
Tungle is a free service and is accessible by the Tungle site, an iPhone app, a Firefox plugin for Google Calendar, and a variety of apps for various social calendars.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Without going off the deep-end here and discussing every single Snort rule keyword, I just wanted to touch on a few modifiers that people so...
-
Let me start off by saying I'm not bashing the writer of this article, and I'm trying not to be super critical. I don't want to...
-
In my constant state of trying to make things a bit more efficient for myself. (I'm a big believer in automation, ask anyone that has e...