Skip to main content

The Pope Blog

The Pope Blog

Now we know that the world has gone mad. We have a blog tracking the Pope. Now, I'm not knocking on the Pope, it's just funny how now we track people's movements in the digital world.

Comments

Anonymous said…
http://popeiswrong.blogspot.com/

It's a sad day when the current leader of the global Catholic Church still lives with his head in the sand. As others have said, he is not so much a conservative, as he is a reactionary. Of course, this blogger is not Catholic, nor do we believe in any kind of supernatural deity of any organized religion, and we certainly don't believe in some kid called Jesus or this Jewish hocus-pocus stuff called "the messiah". It's just here, folks, on Planet Earth, doing this best with our native intelliegence and evolving DNA. So the pope is not really the representative of anybody or anything, unless you want to see he is the representative or symobl of human's Dark Ages of Superstition.

Meanwhile, here is what some non-superstitious members of the Human Blogosphere are saying about Bene-Dick-tum the 16th:

0.1 Headline "The new Pope"
Okay, it's none of my business, really. He's not my Pope. But Ratzinger? A doctrinal hard-liner? What a lost opportunity. At a time when the deveoped countries are seen as stomping all over the third world via globalization and the heavy-handed behavior of multinationals, the choice of a third-world Pope, or a social liberal, or both, could have been a strong humanistic statement. It also could have gone far toward rejuvenating the Church, which has been -- on the ground, not from Rome -- a force for social justice in many parts of the world, and whose numbers are seriously slipping. Instead, they've chosen a man whose focus is strict doctrinal interpretation. Are they trying to fight fundamentalism with fundamentalism? I see this choice as doing nothing to bring back to the Church people driven away by scandals and the perceived lack of relevance of the Chruch to the day-to-day issues of people's lives. It seems to me this will, if anything, only increase that perception. Oh, well. It's hard to fight the zeitgeist, and hidebound fundamentalism does seem to be the order of the day.

0.2 So how does B-16 see other religions? Good questions.
He sees them as inferior and lacking.
Note: In 1997, Ratzinger called Buddhism an “auto-erotic spirituality”[Benny! Stop masturbating beneath your cloak!] that offers “transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations.”
Hinduism, he said, offers “false hope,” [and yes, Xianity offers true hope, sure, Benny!] in that it guarantees “purification” based on a “morally cruel” concept of reincarnation resembling “a continuous circle of hell.”[And Jesus on the bloody cross is an improvement, you imposter and fraud you!]
At the time, Cardinal Ratzinger, now B-16, predicted that Buddhism would replace Marxism as the Catholic church's main enemy.
QUOTE: “Ratzinger is being falsely described as a conservative, when in fact he, despite his publicly genteel manner, is a raging reactionary. Unlike many American conservatives who oppose gay sexual practices but not their legal rights, Ratzinger in 1992 argued against human rights for gays, stressing that their civil liberties could be ‘legitimately limited.’”

0.3 Pope Ratzinger believes and says this: "That the Jews are connected with God in a special way and that God does not want that bond to fail is entirely obvious" ...."We wait for the instant in which Israel will say 'yes' to Christ, but we know that it has a special mission in history now ... which is significant for the world."
Come on Papa Ratzi, the Jews aint never going anywhere near Christ. Get over it. Wake up and smell the reality of your post-Christian idiocy!

0.4 "The world celebrates a 78-year old anti-gay, anti-contraception, anti-choice, anti-euthanasia, anti-premarital-intercourse and anti-21st-Century Pope! I could go on and on about Pope Benedict XVI but Peat over at ''Peephole in my Skull'' blog types faster."

0.5 ''I don't know why you even care. Like you said, he is not your Pope. And in fact, he is nobody's Pope. There is no God, never was, there is no Messiah, never was and never will be, and the entire religous dogma that comes out of the Middle East -- all three great psuedo-religions -- is nothing but leftover history from the Dark Ages of humankind. Why even both to blog about this? Get over it, these popes represent nothing but the collapse of superstitious dogma. Order lunch. ''

0.6 Bottom line: Benny 16 is going nowhere fast. He against the Buddhists, against the Hindus, waiting for the Jews to convert en masse ("The messiah has come, the messiah has come," Moshe, don't forget to bring the Chinese take-out!"), against the Moslems, against the Shintoists, against the aggies (agnostics) and athees (atheists), and he is surely against the gays and lesbians and bisexuals of the world, not to mention women clergy, women priests and a female pope. Long live the Dark Ages of Human Silliness! God bless Benny the 16th!
The moral majority has spoken once again, the Conservatives have won and the Liberals are having another tantrum. One day, you guys will realize that some things will never change including the Catholic Church. What makes the Catholic Church unique is that it has not fragmented to please Liberals and still remains one of the largest institutions in the world despite you guys. It holds steadfast in its beliefs. Remember, it was Cardinal Ratzinger who supported priests refusing communion to Liberals who support pro-choice. What was that loser's name....John Kerry ;)
The moral majority has spoken once again, the Conservatives have won and the Liberals are having another tantrum. One day, Liberals will realize that some things will never change including the Catholic Church. What makes the Catholic Church unique is that it has not fragmented to please Liberals and still remains one of the largest, wealthiest institutions in the world despite Liberal whining. The Catholic Church holds steadfast in its beliefs. Remember, it was Cardinal Ratzinger who supported priests refusing communion to Liberals who support pro-choice. What was that loser's name....John Kerry ;)
The moral majority has spoken once again, the Conservatives have won and the Liberals are having another tantrum. One day, you guys will realize that some things will never change including the Catholic Church. What makes the Catholic Church unique is that it has not fragmented to please Liberals and still remains one of the largest institutions in the world despite you guys. It holds steadfast in its beliefs. Remember, it was Cardinal Ratzinger who supported priests refusing communion to Liberals who support pro-choice. What was that loser's name....John Kerry ;)

Popular posts from this blog

Offset, Depth, Distance, and Within

Without going off the deep-end here and discussing every single Snort rule keyword, I just wanted to touch on a few modifiers that people sometimes misunderstand.  They aren't difficult, and hopefully after this explanation and a few examples, I can clear some of the air around these five modifiers.

The five modifiers that I am talking about are
OffsetDepthDistanceWithinnocaseThese five modifiers are not keywords of themselves, but rather they apply as modifiers to another keyword.  That keyword is "content". The content keyword is one of the easiest pieces of the Snort rules language as all it does is look for a particular string.  So for instance if I wanted to look for the word "joel" within a packet.  A simple:
content:"joel";Would allow me to do that.  The interesting part comes into play when you want to specify where inside of a particular packet you want the string "joel" to be looked for.  If you are running just a plain content ma…

Writing Snort Rules Correctly

Let me start off by saying I'm not bashing the writer of this article, and I'm trying not to be super critical.  I don't want to discourage this person from writing articles about Snort rules.  It's great when people in the Snort community step up and explain some simple things out there.  There are mistakes, it comes with the territory.  If you choose to be one of the people that tries to write Snort rules, you also choose to be someone who wants to learn how to do it better.  That's why I write this blog post, not to bash the writer, but to teach.

I noticed this post today over at the "Tao of Signature Writing" blog, and to be honest I glanced over most of it figuring it was a rehash of things I've already read or things that have already been written from countless people about "Here's how you write Snort rules!".  I scrolled down quickly skimming, not reading at all really, and noticed this part:
Now, let us look at the second questio…

Safari 5.1.4 now available

Safari 5.1.4 now available, fixes issues and improves performance | TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog:


Improve JavaScript performanceImprove responsiveness when typing into the search field after changing network configurations or with an intermittent network connectionAddress an issue that could cause webpages to flash white when switching between Safari windowsAddress issues that prevented printing U.S. Postal Service shipping labels and embedded PDFsPreserve links in PDFs saved from webpagesFix an issue that could make Flash content appear incomplete after using gesture zoomingFix an issue that could cause the screen to dim while watching HTML5 videoImprove stability, compatibility and startup time when using extensionsAllow cookies set during regular browsing to be available after using Private BrowsingFix an issue that could cause some data to be left behind after pressing the "Remove All Website Data" button